Showing posts with label ed wood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ed wood. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 March 2014

Bad Movie Appreciation Society: Plan 9 from Outer Space (or how I learned to stop worrying and love shitty movies)

Bad Movie Appreciation Society: Plan 9 from Outer Space



Following on from the previous article about ‘so bad its good’ movies, a good place to start when looking at their history would be the most notorious one of all, referred to as the Citizen Kane of bad movies: Plan 9 from Outer Space.

So where to start with this monstrosity? Well, some background first.
Plan 9 was released in 1959, directed by Ed Wood. In 1980, two years after his death, Wood was given The Golden Turkey award for being ‘The Worst Director of All Time.’ Prior to Plan 9, Wood had made a few low budget films such as Glen or Glenda  (actually quite a bold movie, exploring transgender issues in what was a very conservative era. Or at least it would have been if weren’t so terribly executed) and Bride of the Monster (not to be confused with The Bride of Frankenstein). All his films were critically panned.

But what did Wood have to work with? 


In his Hollywood career, Wood had collected around him what probably in his mind were a rival to Orson Welle’s Mercury Theatre group. In reality, they were a strange, bizarre group of people.
Firstly, there was Tor Johnson, a Swedish former professional wrestler. Johnson plays Inspector Clay in Plan 9. Clay carries much of the dialogue in the first part of the movie, unfortunately Johnson is near incomprehensible.
Secondly, there is Crisswell who plays the narrator. Before making Plan 9, Crisswell was a TV psychic and he opens the movie with the line:
Greetings, my friend. We are all interested in the future, for that is where you
and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember my friend, future
events such as these will affect you in the future.


And that basically sets the tone for the rest of the movie.
Then there is the impossibly thin-waisted Vampira (you have to see it to believe it), who as you may have guessed from her name dresses up like a vampire (think Morticia from The Addams Family). She had hosted a TV show in America that showed classic horror movies. She was a star name to have in the cast, unfortunately she didn’t want to speak any dialogue.

Wood did have one trump card up his sleeve though, Bela Lugosi. The Hungarian actor was the original screen Dracula in 1931 and to some still the definitive screen version of the character. He had kept a steady stream of work coming in during the 30’s working on Universal horror films often alongside his great rival, Boris Karloff. When Universal pulled the plug on its horror department however, Lugosi was left out on his ear. His European accent was a stumbling block to him getting any major film roles and he fell into heroin addiction. I don’t want to suggest Wood exploited Lugosi but it was evident he needed the money and he was cast in several Ed Wood productions. Sadly for one of cinema’s great screen icons, Plan 9 from Outer Space would be his last feature film as he died during film. As Bela Lugosi wanders off screen in the first few minutes of the film we hear screeching tyres. How appropriate for the rest of the film but sad for Lugosi that one of the first sequences of the film has a car crash.
But Lugosi’s death led to one of the most bizarre things in Plan 9. When trying to think what he could do to replace Lugosi in the film, Wood noticed his wife’s chiropractor bore a striking resemblance to Lugosi, as long as you only saw the top of his face. This led to Wood casting him in the film but he would walk with a cape covering the lower part of his face at all times.

So with a stellar cast like that, what could go wrong?

The plot of Plan 9 from Outer Space centres on an alien invasion of Earth. The aliens (who are human in appearance) want to stop mankind just as they are on the verge of making a discovery that could threaten the rest of the universe due to our hostile and warlike nature. Prior to going into films, Wood had served in the US military in World War Two, so at least on this point Wood could be claiming to speak from a voice of experience.
Rather than using a standard invasion strategy, the aliens activate Plan 9. This plan involves reanimation of the earth’s dead but only three of them. As far as great plans go, it’s pretty ineffective and to wipe out a planet of 6 billion people, the aliens are obviously playing the long game on this. Other than that there is little else to say, other that the humans win when they beat the alien general in a fist-fight that causes enough damage for their suspiciously square looking flying saucer to explode. Yeah, it’s pretty bad.

Production wise is where Wood really shows his expertise. Starting with the most unconvincing looking cockpit in screen history, we are then treated to an array of sparse and dodgy looking sets. Tombstones wobble, actors can be seen waiting for their cues and strings are clearly visible on alien spaceships. Day switches to night back to day between shots making it near impossible to tell how much time is supposed to have passed.

Yet all that could be forgiven if the story and dialogue were any good. Audiences are quite understanding that special effects might not be up to scratch, we are aware of the financial constraints film makers often find themselves under. But the script is the element the director does have control over and in Plan 9 from Outer Space the script is awful.

For all its failings, it’s hard not to love Plan 9 from Outer Space, Ed Wood’s magnum opus. As alluded to in my previous article, the best SBIG movies come from a place of love. An earnest belief by those involved that what they are making is a great movie however misguided that may be.

Plan 9 should be shown to film students and lovers of film everywhere, right alongside Citizen Kane. The latter as an example of how to make a great movie, the former to show how not to make a movie.

Plan 9 from Outer Space trailer:

Some of the previously rejected plans:

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

When Does a Bad Movie Become Good?

I recently watched the documentary, Best Worst Movie and frankly, it’s bizarre when you think about it.
The documentary centres around the 1992 film Troll 2, widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made. Twenty years on, the film has gained a massive cult following and is playing in packed out cinemas across America. And it’s spreading, Troll 2 is gaining a following across Europe as well.

The story is ridiculous, the actors are terrible, the dialogue is worse, direction is non-existent and there are no trolls to be seen. Yet people love it? Why? Why are people lapping up this rubbish?

It makes no sense. If you were asked to choose between watching a good movie and a bad movie, you’d choose the good movie wouldn’t you? Yet no, these people are choosing to watch Troll 2 instead. In the time it takes to watch Troll 2 you could have watched Citizen Kane, widely regarded as one of the best films ever made.*

The charm of Troll 2 seems to stem from the fact those involved didn’t seem aware they were making a bad film. It falls into that old cliché of being ‘so bad it’s good.’ But when does that occur exactly in the film making process? The Twilight films for example, will never have to worry about falling into this category.
To become ‘so bad its good’ a movie has to fail on every level. The run-of-the-mill bad movie will usually get at least some elements of the film right. The success of a film is built on lots of different facets such as the acting, casting, dialogue, direction, editing, sound, music, etc.  The SBIG movie will mess up on almost if not all of them.
But again for it to really succeed (or indeed, fail) it needs to appear that those involved don’t know the film is terrible. Ed Wood, director of Plan 9 from Outer Space, was said by those around him to be unaware how bad a director he was, so consumed was he in his ‘art’.

It’s tempting to think this comes down to an issue of budget as many films proclaimed as being SBIG are typically low budget. There may be some truth to this but on the flip side this argument ignores the many good films made on small budgets throughout cinema’s history. Kevin Smith’s first (and best) film Clerks was made for $30,000 (largely self-funded) with a cast of unknown local actors. This only equates to about an eighth of the budget given to Troll 2. It’s perhaps ironic that it was when Kevin Smith was given a budget to work with and able to cast well-known actors in his films it all started to go a bit pear-shaped (I’m looking at you Affleck).


There is a growing market for bad movies. When making Mystery Science Theatre 3000 in the 90’s, a TV programme based around the idea of making fun of bad movies, the producers would be inundated with requests from directors to show their films as they knew an appearance would increase their sales.
In modern times, Asylum pictures lead the way in bad movie releases with titles such as Megashark vs Giant Octopus and Sharknado. This trend is even shifting over to mainstream Hollywood with films built around ludicrous premises (Snakes on a Plane anyone?).
But where these films fall down for me is in that we’re supposed to think these films are bad, everything is played with a knowing wink and a smile. They are not true SBIG movies. The SBIG movie does not know how awful it is.

There is a theory that some film makers have deliberately tried to make their films as bad as possible to achieve SBIG status. A good analogy for this would be The Producer’s, where they deliberately try to make the worst musical ever but inadvertently become the biggest hit on Broadway.
Birdemic is a film often cited as an example of this. I don’t buy it. If you were to ever watch Birdemic (there are clips on youtube), you would realise that to have deliberately made a film as bad as this would have taken a lot of effort. And if you are going to put that much effort in then you might as well try and make a good movie.

I don’t believe anyone sets out to make a bad movie but through factors such as bad stories, bad actors and just sheer bloody incompetence they do it. And I, and many others, love them for it.



*you may have worked out, I spend a lot of time watching bad movies when I could be watching Citizen Kane. Yet I’ve never seen Troll 2.