IMDB Bottom 100: Number 19 - Daniel the Wizard

Daniel the Wizard (2004)

Watch trailer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2vKfxXE7_4

Oh good lord what is this?

I’ve watched this twice and I still don’t understand what was supposed to be going on.

Let’s start with the title, Daniel the Wizard. Firstly, Daniel is not a wizard, he’s a singer. Daniel Küblböck who finished third in German Idol no less. Which obviously qualified him to be in a movie. I’ve dealt with Pop Idol people in films before, From Justin to Kelly, but at least that had some form of structure to it. Daniel The Wizard (or Daniel Der Zauberer in its native German) is all over the place.

There are some members of the magic circle who want to kill Daniel because movie. Seriously, I have no idea why they want him dead, maybe because of his effeminate nature and they really hate that. Or maybe they just didn’t like his music.

So it’s like if Paul Daniels wanted to take out Chico.

*Pitch Idea: Paul Daniels catches Chico having ‘Chico-Time’ with Debbie McGee. So Daniels puts a bounty on Chico’s head and he has to go on the run. David Copperfield and Penn & Teller try to claim the bounty before Chico, aided only by Rik Waller, confronts Daniels in a one-on-one final showdown to the death.

I’m filing that one away with Gates & Young: Vice (see number 30: From Justin to Kelly). I think people will like it, but not a lot (sorry).

Anyway, back to Daniel the-less-than Wizard. A couple of assassins are hired to do the job at a concert but they just can’t go through with it, I guess his songs were just too magical. And then they all end up playing together in the snow. And I wish to God I was making that up but that actually happens.

There are other tiny, minuscule sub-plots about a teen fan of Daniel’s and him auditioning for a Hollywood film (with what to me looks like one of the worst auditions ever but they hire him anyway) but they don’t go anywhere so they are hardly worth bringing up except to point out that all they do is add to the chaotic mess of the film.

We do get ‘treated’ to a number of Daniel’s songs and though much like with Bollywood films I try to stay away from musical criticism, his songs are bad. Really bad. Watching him singing about being a ‘Rock and Roll hero’ the only natural response is ‘No. You’re not. You’re really not.’

The soundtrack is mostly Daniel Küblböck’s songs apart from Tchkaivosky’s Swan Lake. Why that’s there I have no idea but that always reminds me of Dracula. The best Dracula starring Bela Lugosi, if you’ve not seen it, go see it. Then watch Lugosi’s other films, a great actor but typecast in horror films and held back in the Hollywood studio system by his Hungarian accent.

I appear to keep getting distracted but that’s only because I really don’t want to think about this film anymore. Even star Küblböck said in interviews he was so thrilled to have been offered a movie part he never stopped to think about it making no sense.

It’s 77 minutes long but feels like it goes on for six hours. It’s revealed at the end one of the wizard’s is Daniel’s father. Or at least I think it was, I could easily have just been making up my own endings because by that point, I just really didn’t care.

IMDB Bottom 100: Number 20 - Pledge This!

Number 20: Pledge This! (2006)

Trailer link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyefc0vJwj4

I’ve been trying to think how to best tackle this review of the 2006 Paris Hilton film about a group of awkward outsiders who want to join a bitchy sorority and I think the best way to go about it is this:

THIS FILM IS HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE! HORRIBLE I TELL YOU! HORRIBLE IS TOO SMALL A WORD TO DO JUSTICE TO THIS CATASTROPHE OF A MOVIE.

RIGHT FROM ITS GAUDY OPENING CREDITS TO ITS STUPID FOODFIGHT ENDING, I WANTED TO SCOOP MY EYES OUT WITH A RUSTY SPOON.

PARIS HILTON, WHO REMINDS ME OF A GIRAFFE BY THE WAY, HAS NO BUSINESS BEING IN MOVIES. LUCKILY HER ‘CHARACTER’ IS JUST PARIS HILTON SO SHE DOESN’T EXACTLY HAVE TO STRETCH HERSELF. SHE SHOULD STICK TO WHAT SHE DOES BEST WHICH FROM WHAT I CAN TELL IS STANDING AROUND BEING RICH. HER CHARACTER, WHO IS CLEARLY THE VILLAIN, DOESN’T EVEN GET HER COME-UPPANCE AT THE END (SORRY, SPOILER BUT IF YOU CHOOSE TO WATCH THIS AFTER MY WARNINGS FRANKLY YOU DESERVE TO HAVE YOUR ‘ENTERTAINMENT’ RUINED). NO, SOMEHOW SHE EMERGES AS THE GODDAMN HERO FROM THIS ALL. IT'S OTHER PEOPLE MAKING HER BAD YOU SEE. SHITTY COP OUT ENDING BECAUSE WE CAN'T MAKE OUR STAR LOOK BAD CAN WE?

NATIONAL LAMPOON! NATIONAL LAMPOON WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU? REMEMBER THE GRISWALDS? THEY WERE FUNNY. SOMETIMES. ANIMAL HOUSE! OK, IT MIGHT BE VIEWED AS SEXIST NOW BUT AT LEAST IT WAS ENTERTAINING WITH IT. IF NOT A STAMP OF QUALITY, NATIONAL LAMPOON USED TO AT LEAST MEAN PASSABILITY.

OH AND FHM’S ENDORSEMENT OF THIS! ISN’T THAT JUST THE CHERRY ON TOP OF THE CRAP FILLED CAKE. THEY’RE NOT A THING ANYMORE BUT THEY HELPED PRODUCE THIS SO GOOD RIDDANCE TO THEM.

In short, I didn’t like it.

IMDB Bottom 100: No's 22 & 21 - Final Justice and Ram Gorpal Varma's Ki Aag

Number 22: Final Justice (1985)

You know, it’s hard to keep trying to coming up with ways to describe how dull and unremarkable a film is and Final Justice is dull and unremarkable.

It’s hard for me to describe what happened in Final Justice as I was distracted while watching it by a particularly tricky game of solitaire I was involved in. And then there was some paint I had to keep an eye on so it dried properly. Then I watched a kettle boil which was a big mistake as time stopped moving yet the film kept playing.

Another entry from our Italian friends, the film stars Joe Don Baker as the preposterously named Sheriff Thomas Jefferson Geronimo III. This is the third film ‘starring’ Joe Don Baker to make it in the Bottom 100 (Mitchell, Leonard 6). If Al Pacino can be taken as a stamp of quality in a movie (Gigli aside, everyone’s allowed one mistake), then Don Baker can be taken as a stamp of shiteness. All hail our bad movie King!

That’s possibly unfair as I haven’t seen every movie he’s been in but in his 50 year plus career, his name does pop up often in films around the lowest part of the IMDB scale.

The film is about him transporting a criminal to Malta, criminal escapes, Sherriff Thomas Jefferson Geronimo III (think about that, he’s the third person in his family to carry that name and I’m pretty sure they mention he has a son who is presumably Thomas Jefferson Geronimo IV) gets the criminal back after having problems with the local police. They din’t know ha to police ya see? They needed a big ol’Texan to show em how it gets done round these pars.

And oh yeah, Geronimo is fat. They mention it a few times like he’s going to keel over and have a heart attack any moment. He doesn’t and it doesn’t play a part in the overall story at all, so why they made a point of mentioning it and that he has to follow a strict diet I have no idea.

To be fair, there are some semi-decent action scenes but nuttin to write home t’da ranch abou’.

Number 21: Ram Gorpal Varma Ki Aag

Yay, back to Bollywood! They’re films are always so bright and colourful.

Well,…not always.

To clarify, this film is actually called Aag (which I’m given to understand means ‘flames’ but if it doesn’t don’t blame me, I don’t speak Hindi), Ram Gorpal Varma is the name of the director.

Ignoring that bit of shameless self-promotion, there is somewhat a scoop here in that this film features Amitabh Bachchan, which the opening credits cheekily claim to be ‘introducing’. Some might think Bachchan is the star of some 200 movies (even a small cameo in Slumdog Millionaire) and arguably the biggest star in Bollywood history but they’d be wrong as this was where he was first introduced.

There’s a nice twist to this actually as Aag is actually a remake of 70’s film Sholay, which Bachchan was also in as one of the main heroes (he plays a different role here). Except of course he wasn’t in Sholay, because as we know this was his first film.

Aag is about two outlaws recruited by a police chief to take down a mobster. That’s the whole film summarised in 15 words but somehow that gets stretched to nearly three hours. Every scene feels like it could have been done in half the time. I think there's a minimum length requirement for Bollywood and I'm not sure if that was sarcasm or if that is actually a thing.

Songs, of course they’re still there and I have my usual gripes with them. Not the songs themselves (music being very subjective) but never have I felt more like ‘we now interrupt this movie to bring you a music video’ about a Bollywood film then I did here. See, the film is trying to be dark and gritty but the songs just really ruin the atmosphere of it all. I don’t want to see my villain bodypopping.

The background music is all over the place as well. Sometimes it’s 70’s cop show, other times it’s trying to be a western. Which I kind of understand but the levels are all wrong and oft times it drowns out the dialogue.

Where it does shine though, is whenever Amitabh Bachchan is on screen (making his film debut, remember). He plays the main villain, Babban Singh, and he is brilliantly evil. Imagine an older version of Heath Ledger’s Joker from The Dark Knight and you have a good idea of where he’s at. A strong beginning from Mr Bachchan, I can see him having a bright career.

To go back to what I said at the start about Bollywood films not always being bright and colourful, there are some brutal scenes in this. Such as Bachchan playing a game of Russian Roulette with a rival gang boss and another in which he saws a policemans finger off with a hacksaw (and I have to give the director props for using a dark filter in all of debutant Bachchan’s scenes). Unfortunately, these horrific acts of barbarity are usually followed by scenes surrounding the rom-com subplot, rather spoiling the flow of it all.

Worth seeing for a darker side of Bollywood westerners maybe aren’t aware of but there are almost certainly better examples out there.

Please...no more Minions

This has gone too far.

Once they seemed cute and harmless but now they have infiltrated every level of our lives. I am of course talking about Minions. They are everywhere.

Walk down any street and you’ll see one somewhere. Toys, books, films, posters, mugs, keyrings, T-shirts, hats, stickers, onesies, shampoo, toothbrushes, clocks, watches, this thing:

That would all be bearable, many fads have come and gone so it’s not surprising Universal would cash in while they can. That’s all fine. Where it’s gone too far however, is stuff like this:

Yeah, you remember when they said that in the movie? Of course you don’t, because it’s a quote from Socrates (the ancient Greek philosopher not the Brazilian footballer), albeit slightly paraphrased.

This is no accident of design. The creator of this image had the idea of making an image of this inspirational quote. Problem is no one’s going to share a generic quote. Stick a minion on it though and now we’re talking. So now Facebook feeds are full of images of minions stood next to quotes entirely unrelated to their characters.

I saw Despicable Me, I like it (Despicable Me 2 not so much) and the minions are entertaining. Not entertaining enough to justify their own movie. Their silliness only really works in contrast to Gru’s seriousness. It’s what I call Joey Syndrome. People might have thought they’d like to see Joey on his own but actually he was just a single cog in the Friends machine and that’s (one reason) why his sitcom failed.

Minions have gone too far and have become inescapable. If they are not stopped, soon everyone will be walking down the street screaming ‘Ba-na-na’.

Please don’t Minions become this generations Crazy Frog.

IMDB Bottom 100: No's 24 & 23 - Dracula 3000 and Invasion of the Neptune Men

Number 24: Dracula 3000 (2004)

Trailer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od7C8WMLv2Y

A joint effort from Germany and South Africa but don’t be fooled, this is not the 3000^th Dracula film to be made. It just feels that way.

Throughout his film history, Dracula has gone up against everyone from Frankenstein to Billy the Kid to Batman. Heck, even Scooby Doo. It’s hard to maintain total respect for a character who has been outwitted by a dog and his stoner friend.

This should really be subtitled ‘Dracula In Space.’ And actually, I’m amazed it’s taken this long for me to find a film like this. I’m sure there are others out there but it’s the first time I’ve seen the Count on a spaceship. How did he get there? Who knows, just accept it, Dracula is in space finally, just like you always wanted.

There are some semi-famous names involved here. Casper Van Dien (Johnny Rico from Starship Troopers), Erika Eleniak from Baywatch, the rapper Coolio who seems to pop up in just about every early noughties horror film. My favourite though is Tommy ‘Tiny’ Lister.

Standing 6’5”, the ‘Tiny’ is obviously ironic. He has had small roles in lots of films such as playing neighbourhood bully Deebo in Friday and as a prisoner in The Dark Knight (he was the one who threw the detonator out the window). But I will best remember him as Zeus in Hulk Hogan film No Holds Barred. This actually led to him having a short-lived career in wrestling, as his character wants revenge on Hulk Hogan for what happened to him in the movie. So it’s an actor playing a fake character in a fake movie he thinks is real and wants revenge in real life on a fake wrestler in a fake sport.

And that’s not even in the top 50 of stupid wrestling storylines. It was all to promote No Hold Barred, which flopped by the way.

Back to Space Dracula, a freighter ship comes across another ship but it’s been abandoned. After some investigation they find the corpse of the ship’s captain who has a crucifix in front of him. None of the crew know what it is as religion no longer exists in the future. This slightly jars as Coolio and Lister’s characters are the same as how black characters are portrayed today. So in a thousand years, we are no longer divided by religion but we are still divided on racial lines. That’s a depressing thought.

Dracula slowly picks them off, turning them into vampires along the way. The character names offer nods to the books such as Van Helsing and Mina Murray but that’s as far as it goes.

Nothing else to say, though it does have an interesting if confusing ending to it.

It’s bearable.

Number 23: Invasion of the Neptune Men (1961)

Hang on a minute, this is familiar.

A Japanese sci-fi film about an alien invasion, fought off by an invincible hero in a spacecraft with no explanation of how he acquired his abilities. Children running around for no reason and generally getting in the way.

This is just Prince of Space (number 44) again but slightly worse.

You might as well just read that again, they’re so alike: http://badmoviehq.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/imdb-bottom-100-nos-44-43-prince-of.html

The only differences are the Neptune men look even more ridiculous than the aliens in Prince of Space with their stupid funnel head helmets. Though they do blow up a building that has a swastika emblazoned on it (?).

And at least the Prince does spend some time in space so it’s probably just as well our hero here has been downgraded to ‘Space Chief’.

IMDB Bottom 100: No's 26 & 25 - House of the Dead and Space Mutiny

Number 26: House of the Dead (2003)

(couldn't find trailer for the film, so here's one for one of the games instead)

Video games and movies are synonymous with being a perfect match for each other. Every time you see a film is ‘based on the hit video game’, you know you are getting a high quality production.

And no one has done more to advance the art than German director Uwe Boll, the finest director of his generation, universally adored by fans and critics alike…

…is probably what Uwe Boll dreams people say every night.

Boll is the definitive hack director of the noughties. He takes popular video game titles and makes films that bear little resemblance to their source material.

House of the Dead should have been an easier one to do but he still cocks it up somehow.

I have fond memories of playing House of the Dead in the arcade. It was a basic light gun shooting game developed by Sega, fighting off hordes of zombies and other undead creatures. It even had an inspired spin-off game, The Typing of the Dead on the Dreamcast where instead of shooting zombies, you had to type in words that appeared on screen to kill them. Genius. Good times.

Now back to the not so good times.

Following conventional horror movie tradition, a group of teenagers are out on a trip to the woods. Ok, they are going to an island but it’s got woods on it. There’s some big rave party going on but they miss the one boat that goes to the island, so they have to hire out a boat owned by a smuggler. And to be fair, the smuggler captain is the only decent character in the whole film because he’s so badass.

If I was arranging a big rave, location would be important. I’d hold it somewhere with more than one rickety boat going out to it per day but you know, movie.

The name of the island is Isla de Muerte or ‘Island of the Dead’, that’s a strike against the movie. An island is not a house. Pedantic maybe but that’s what happens when you watch dreck like this, every little thing must be held against it.

The teenagers get to the island and let’s not waste time with this here, there are zombies. Lots of zombies. Storywise, there isn’t a lot else to say about it. There is some convoluted story about Spanish conquistadores which is not part of the games lore. There are some nods to the games such as one of the characters is a science student called Rudolph Curien, the villain of the game is Dr Curien.

There is a girl called Liberty in the film who is of Asian descent dressed in a sexy American flag catsuit. One of the other girls says she is ‘not your traditional all red, white and blue girl’. A random thing to bring up here but then it was a random and unnecessary piece of racism.

Being based on House of the Dead, there is a lot of zombie shooting going on but not much reloading. They obviously worked out all you need to do is shoot off-screen to reload. But somehow, Uwe Boll manages to make the shooting and blowing up of zombies boring. I don’t even know how that’s possible but they found a way. It just seems to go on forever.

The acting is competent but I didn’t feel I knew anything more about the characters at the end then I did right at the start.

There are little clips of the video game that pop up constantly throughout the film. Basically, Boll is using them as wipes to cut between scenes. Which is fine, except I would rather be watching those than the film in between.

What Uwe Boll should have done is gone to an arcade and just filmed someone playing House of the Dead. That would have been awesome.

Comparatively.

Number 25: Space Mutiny (1988)

So it’s mutiny. I never thought I’d see the day.

It’s a weird one this, watching it feels like you’re only seeing half the movie. Presumably the other half would have made it all make sense.

The film starts off ok with a space battle straight from the original Battlestar Galactica TV series (the 1978 one, when Starbuck was a man). No really, it is literally footage from Battlestar Galactica. Same ships and everything.

The characters are…strange. I don’t know what they told the actor who plays the captain what his role in the film was, he looks like he’s trying to play a cross between Zeus and Santa Claus. The hero is just a bland musclehead but I think there is a director’s cut of this film where we get to hear the other half of his conversations, as most of the time it just seems like he’s talking to himself. He has a love interest and IMDB says actress Cisse Cameron was 34 when this was released but she looks 20 years older.

There’s a creepy European guy and an officer with a limp, could they be our villains? Is that even remotely possible? If they are, they’ve done an amazing job throwing us off the scent. (They are).

There is an amazing error in continuity. Usually continuity errors are dull little things like a man might be wearing a tie in a scene but in the next shot he isn’t and then he is. In Space Mutiny, a bridge officer is murdered then it cuts to the next scene and there she is sitting on the bridge. Forgetting a character had been killed off is a new high/low for continuity errors.

Oh yeah, if anyone has a hula-hoop you are ahead of the game as along with lots of neon (obviously) everyone will be bringing hula-hoops to nightclubs in the future. Exciting times.

The rest of the inside of the ship looks remarkably like a factory warehouse, complete with windows. Then there’s the absurd overuse of slow-motion, a common complaint in bad sci-fi films.

The story is something about weapons being smuggled off the ship but that’s all secondary. The real star here is the car crash that is this movie.

Recycled footage, complete lack of attention detail, bad acting, odd characters, poor sets, rubbish directing. I loved it.

It’s a great example of the so bad its good movie. Everything is wrong, it goes round the dial of being a bad movie but the needle keeps on spinning until it becomes good again.

I urge you all to see it.

IMDB Bottom 100: No's 28 & 27 - Die Hard Dracula and Who's Your Caddy?

Number 28: Die Hard Dracula (1998)

When I saw the title of this film, two possibilities came to mind:

1)      This is a little known entry in the Die Hard series where John McClane takes on the undead. With huge explosions and helicopter crashes (not likely)

2)      This is a spoof comedy (more likely)

Actually it’s neither. At least, I don’t think it is. It’s obviously not Die Hard but I’m not exactly sure what it is. I think it’s supposed to be a standard horror update of the Dracula but it’s so goofy in places, I’m not sure it isn’t meant to be a comedy.

That’s the biggest problem this film has: it doesn’t know if it’s a serious horror or a comedy. It’s another cheaply made film, to the point where if you listen closely enough, you can hear the director giving instructions to the cast.

This film goes wrong right from the opening narration when they recount the story of Vlad the Impaler, long believed to have been the inspiration for Bram Stroker’s most famous creation. It states he died in 1599. Vlad the Impaler actually died in 1477 so history is already a loser.

Then we see Dracula’s coffin flying through the air. Yeah. Apparently he got fed up listening to all the prayers from the local church for 300 years. As good a reason as any to move I guess.

Cut to present day and we meet Steve and Julia, enjoying some water-skiing. Steve gives Julia a life jacket to wear but she turns it down. Can you guess what happens next?

To get over it all, Steve heads over to Europe. And actor Denny Sachen had obviously been watching Francis Ford Coppola’s 1992 Bram Stroker’s Dracula because he is really channelling his inner Keanu Reeves. A blanker slate you will not find.

Dracula on the other hand is channeling his inner Meatloaf from the I Would Do Anything for Love video crossed with Arnold Schwarzenegger as Dr Freeze in Batman and Robin. He likes to make a pun but he feels deep inner pain because of it.

Van Helsing makes his appearance and well, even in the original book the good Doctor was a bit eccentric but here he is just ridiculous. I don’t even know what country he is supposed to be from, we’ll say Germerica. He is the expert in killing vampires, apart from thinking silver tipped bullets kill vampires. Not that I’d ever try to tell Dr Van Helsing how to do his job but that’s werewolves.

He actually tries to kill Dracula with his silver bullet which doesn’t work because he’s not a werewolf. But Van Helsing comes to the perfectly logical conclusion it didn’t work because Dracula’s heart floats around his body. It sounds so obvious when you say it out loud. Or maybe it’s because Dracula is NOT A F&*%ING WEREWOLF!

The story is the standard Dracula village-in-peril plot where young ladies are being taken and transformed into vampires. The village is somewhat confusing because it’s not quite sure what time period its set in. Some of the people are dressed in modern clothes while some are from the 18^th century. Amongst the confusion, Van Helsing and Keanu Steves have vowed to stop Dracula.

Where I will give this film some props is the ending, it’s not what you would expect and dammit, it works.

The soundtrack is a curious thing in this film. The background music is taken from 80’s episodes of Dr Who while the rest comes from Now That’s What I Call Classical and mostly doesn’t fit with the images on screen. Though there is one part where Dracula is playing Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake on the piano. This is actually something I thoroughly approve of as this is the main theme from the 1931 Universal adaptation of Dracula (and as an aside, Bela Lugosi is still the best screen Dracula there has ever been).

It’s an odd thing this one. If it tried to be a horror or a comedy this could probably have been a half decent film. Unfortunately, because it’s neither it comes out as a confused mess. But it’s an enjoyable confused mess.

Number 27: Who’s Your Caddy? (2007)

Oh God. I just looked at the title and knew this was going to be painful. Who’s your caddy and what does he do?

It’s a comedy so that’s always a bad sign for this list. Bad films can have redeeming features such as ridiculously bad acting that can make them enjoyable, bad comedies are always just bad.

It’s a hip-hop comedy with black rappers as well, so better get my white guy subtitles on.

This film wastes no time with the implied racism as two minutes in we are given the main crux of the film. Rapper C-Note (played by rapper Big Boi) arrives with his entourage at an exclusive golf and country club wanting membership. Never explicitly stated but heavily implied is they don’t want him to join as they don’t want a black member in their club.

C-Note is able to exploit a loophole to get in the club using some nearby property he buys. Which is convenient. The film then becomes about villain Cummings (Principal Rooney from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off) trying to get C-Note out of his club. It’s very important because a decision is being made about hosting the US Open in a couple weeks. I guess the USGA must be racist and wouldn’t want to hold their biggest event at a venue with a black member?

So shenanigans ensue as C-Note and his crew show all the stuffy, uptight white people how to hang loose and ‘be real.’ There is a touch of misogyny about it and I don’t know about the ethics of giving cannabis to horses but it is generally good fun.

The film builds towards its inevitable conclusion: a golf match between C-Note and Cummings for Presidency of the golf club. And it’s just as exciting as a real golf match i.e, it’s as exciting as watching paint dry while waiting for the kettle to boil.

It delves into 90’s Sports movie territory when losing at the halfway point, Uncle Phil from Fresh Prince of Bel Air steps in to deliver the inspirational speech. You see C-Notes father had been a caddy at the club and had broken the course record but Cummings wouldn’t accept it and he was fired from the club. Again, racism implied. This should be a major plot point in the rivalry between C-Note and Cummings but is so rarely referred to it comes across as coincidental.

I don’t need to tell you who goes on to win the game. One in the eye for da man.

There are some good characters in the film but protagonist C-Note is not one of them. That’s mainly because he has it too easy. Cummings is obviously a horrible person but C-Note has his number at every turn so it never feels like he’s ever in peril. Even when he is losing the final game it never feels like he’s in any trouble so the whole thing lacks any dramatic tension.

Even with his love interest in the film, Shannon, who is Cummings lawyer, there is nothing to it. No shenanigans or contrived misunderstandings they just meet a couple times and hey presto! They’re a couple!

I have seen worse films (such as any of Adam Sandler movies) but this is far from good. The biggest crime for a comedy film, it’s not funny and the story is dully predictable right from the start. I could have saved myself a lot of time just by seeing the first meeting between C-Note and Cummings and then fast-forwarding right to the final golf match at the end.

And I would not have missed a thing.